CO129-218 - Administrator Marsh Governor Sir Bowen & Others - 1884 [11-12] — Page 240

paper published about 15 April. ad Body patch band by mad be

E

is do

rate

delete of thip this rare thin that the affece But the Ordinan (for reas

reasons given at length on 1890) in objectionable that it ought perhaps hardly to have been passed brought into operation, without the approval first obtained of the Sec. So perhaps nothing need be said in reply to this portion defence of

delay-

at any

of State

as

to supposed

Nor perhaps need we d

defend ourselves for asking questions in consequence of paragi noticed (not in obscure... disse- putable papers" but) in the best (if not "the only) paper published in London on Chinese affairs. by another marked "Tepurate"

? Acknowledge this despatch and concur in the suggestion made in the P.S. desp (on 15602) being marked

as to our

"Separate"

the understanding of coured

that the original desp. (no. 273) to which reply, has been removed from

it was a

that public record in the C.S.0.

S.W.9.27xb. Euch 26

I think it should might also be said

that Lund dulys despoted It 131 did not excision

J

the Froomer's action

criticism hany or impute to hear

any negligence both

that the State

Statement

ar

237

which Lord Herly asked for explanation

exportatte Land in The Benz in her

taken from a

•fost conect though

newspaper and that the despatch did not afsume the statcount it toh torati so and that as it's date shews the despatch was written and signed before this receipt of the frames's despelit

transmetting the Ordinance.

Ew 3.2

Jeff

D.

Feb.3.

Dr. J. Howen arts for a telegram

says that the land

authorising hair & male this despalat Separati Sent. 1.50 pun "Separati" coll suffice 6. belepaph.

Jus9/2

Alean

Mutt Seb q

Page 240Page 241